Search this Topic:
Had2 wrote:Yes, it was accomplished, and since then I have said that it was made.
And I say that no other person responds for me, it is I who receive and open all letters and respond to them.
Who gave you the authority to speak for Sr. Lucia Midgie?
August 1989 - November 1989 - Computer-generated and typewritten notes and letters supposedly signed by Sister Lucy suddenly appear, flatly contradicting all prior statements she has made for more than 60 years about the Consecration. These notes contain factual errors Sister Lucy could not have made (e.g. the false statement that Pope Paul VI consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart during his 1967 visit to Fatima) and phraseology she had never used before. Until now, "Sister Lucy" has never conducted correspondence with typewriters or word processors, and she still continues to write everything else, including her lengthy memoirs, by hand.
Chronology of a Cover-up
Assad and Putin are testing the US in Syria. Trump is answering.
by Tom Rogan | Jun 19, 2017, 8:47 AM
On Sunday, an F-18 fighter jet (almost certainly from the Mediterranean-deployed USS George H.W. Bush carrier strike group), downed a Syrian Air Force Su-22 fighter jet.
It was the right decision for both tactical and strategic reasons.
For a start, the Syrian jet was bombing United States allies (the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces) on the ground. It was warned, but did not retreat.
Yet it's not just relevant who the Syrians were bombing, it's also important where they were doing so. Because the Su-22 was striking targets in north-central Syria, proximate to the Islamic State capital, Raqqa, and a town and dam, Taqba.
That locale matters for two reasons.
First, because the Syrian axis (Bashar Assad, Russia, Iran, the Lebanese Hezbollah, and other associated Shiite militias) are determined to displace U.S./allied forces from that area. The Assad axis recognizes that if it secures Taqba, it can push east of the Euphrates river and degrade anti-regime forces operating there with U.S. protection. As I've explained, this area of northern Syria is crucial for the future of the Syrian civil war.
Second, had the U.S. allowed axis forces to displace Kurdish forces from the area, the axis would have been able to disrupt the operation to retake Raqqa from the Islamic State. While the axis argue that they support the U.S.-led effort to defeat the Islamic State, the reality is different.
After all, the axis have vested interests in allowing the Islamic State to survive in some form. While the Islamic State is indeed their enemy, its existence allows the axis to pretend that the choice in Syria is between Assad, and the Islamic State and al Qaeda. Russia, especially, uses this narrative to delegitimate and attack more-moderate U.S.-supported Syrian rebel groups. Ever notice that the Russians always claim they are bombing "terrorists" in Syria? The Islamic State gives them that excuse.
Absent the threat of the Islamic State, the axis powers know that the world would view the Syrian regime much more harshly. Absent international jihadist groups in Syria, the regime would no longer be able to claim "we're the best of a bad bunch."
Still, there's a broader issue at stake here.
This latest axis push against U.S. interests is just the tip of the iceberg. As I noted recently, the axis is also threatening a major U.S. base in south-eastern Syria. Collectively, these efforts are designed to test the Trump administration's commitment to U.S. interests in Syria. Put simply, by escalating their threat against the U.S., and by dangling the prospect of future U.S. casualties, the Assad axis wishes for the Trump administration to back away from its resistance to Assad's regime. They believe that, as was the case with President Barack Obama's red lines, the U.S. can ultimately be compelled to yield.
For that reason, the U.S. response on Sunday was the right one.
A two-person U.S. aircrew in an advanced multirole fighter met a Soviet-era aircraft and outmatched it.
The United States remains the world's sole superpower. Realistic in our appraisal of national interests and prudent in their pursuit, our adversaries must never doubt our resolve.
Had2 wrote:Who gave you the authority to speak for Sr. Lucia Midgie?
Had2 wrote:The letter was not typed.. That's another lie you like to spread. Do your homework and do yourself a favor ...stop posting nut-bar conspiracy theories about Russia, Fatima, dooms day prophesies and the end of the world because all you're doing is making yourself look like an fool.
Sr. Lucia's own hand can be found.
[available from http://www.fatimafamily.org/]
careful reading of the text of the so-called third “secret” of Fatima,
published here in its entirety long after the fact and by decision of the Holy
Father, will probably prove disappointing or surprising after all the
speculation it has stirred. No great mystery is revealed; nor is the future
unveiled. We see the Church of the martyrs of the century which has just passed
represented in a scene described in a language which is symbolic and not easy to
decipher. Is this what the Mother of the Lord wished to communicate to
Christianity and to humanity at a time of great difficulty and distress? Is it
of any help to us at the beginning of the new millennium? Or are these only
projections of the inner world of children, brought up in a climate of profound
piety but shaken at the same time by the tempests which threatened their own
time? How should we understand the vision? What are we to make of it?
Sister Lucia Confirmed That Russia Had Been
VATICAN CITY, FEB. 14, 2005 (Zenit.org).- The Fatima
has been totally revealed by the Vatican, and Russia has already been
as Mary requested, confirmed Sister Maria Lucia of Jesus and the
The witness of the apparitions of the Blessed Virgin
Fatima made this statement to the then secretary of the Congregation
the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, on Nov. 17,
contradicting those who say that the Church still has secrets about the
The content of the interview held between the
representative and Sister Lucia in the convent of Coimbra, Portugal,
she resided, was made public by the Vatican press office on Dec. 20,
The text of the document states: "In recent months,
following the sad events of the September 11 terrorist attacks,
appeared in newspapers alleging new revelations by Sister Lucia,
of letters of warning to the Pope, and apocalyptic reinterpretations of
the Fatima message."
"Moreover, emphasis was placed on the suspicion that
Holy See had not published the entire text of the third part of the
and some 'Fatimist' movements have repeated the accusation that the
Father has yet to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary,"
As a result, the Vatican note clarifies, it was
necessary that Archbishop Bertone go personally "to clarify and obtain
direct information from the visionary."
The meeting was held in the presence of Father Luis
vice postulator of the cause of Blessed Francisco and Jacinta (the
Fatima visionaries), and of the prioress of St. Teresa's Carmelite
The conversation took place on the afternoon of that
17 and lasted more than two hours. Sister Lucia, then 94, "was in great
form -- lucid and vivacious," the Vatican envoy said.
The meeting addressed the question of the third part
the secret of Fatima. The Portuguese religious said that she had read
and meditated on the fascicle published by the Congregation for the
of the Faith and confirms everything that is written," the Vatican
When the archbishop explained that there are doubts
part of the secret remains unknown, Sister Lucia replied: "Everything
been published; there are no more secrets."
"If I had received new revelations, I would not have
them to anyone, but I would have told them directly to the Holy
the religious added.
There was then talk about the statements of Nicholas
a Canadian priest suspended "a divinis," who is collecting signatures
that the Pope finally consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of
and alleging that this has never been done.
Sister Lucia told the archbishop: "The Carmel
has rejected the forms for the collection of signatures. I have already
said that the consecration requested by Our Lady was done in 1984, and
it has been accepted in heaven."
Lastly, the conversation turned to Sister Lucia's
life. Some press articles suggested that her concern robbed her of
and that she was praying night and day.
The religious answered: "It's not true. How would I
able to pray during the day if I did not sleep at night? How many
they attribute to me! How many things they make me do! They should read
my book; the advice and appeals that correspond to Our Lady's wishes
there. Prayer and penance, with great faith in God's power, will save
Midgiel952 wrote:Rich, "Russia" is not in Scripture by that specific name. I did not say Russia is not in Scripture by another name. Most Bible commentators interpret “Magog” as Russia from the prophecy of Ezekiel 38.What is Mary's "Dark Divination"
Where are you getting this from?
God bless you
What is Mary's "Dark Divination"
"Another self-inflicted wound is Bertone’s statement that “Sister Lucy never worked with a computer.” Here Bertone forgets that, when it was expedient for him to do so, he asserted precisely the opposite: that Sister Lucy “even used a computer” in 1989—a claim that, as Socci notes, “served to accredit certain letters that Sister Lucy had not written in her own hand and which contradicted everything she had said before on the consecration of Russia.” Bertone has thus undermined all claims that Sister Lucy was the author of those letters."Cardinal Bertone attempts an answer to Antonio Socci’s explosive book
© 2017 Yuku. All rights reserved.